Ed Phillips
2017-01-05 16:28:50 UTC
Messages to the mailing list appear to be getting delayed sometimes. I
just received a bunch that were delayed.
An example is attached below... delayed over a month?!?!?
Ed Phillips <***@udel.edu> University of Delaware (302) 831-6082
Systems Programmer IV, Network and Systems Services
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Return-Path: <sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org>
X-Original-To: ***@udel.edu
Delivered-To: ***@udel.edu
Received: from mail-pf0-f200.google.com (mail-pf0-f200.google.com
[209.85.192.200])
by ed-dev.nss.udel.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2C91001C9
for <***@udel.edu>; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:59:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-pf0-f200.google.com with SMTP id z128so69982995pfb.4
for <***@udel.edu>; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State:
AIkVDXJtlV8bFKJYDUO1mMOG06S8bqNQE0D/8Dk9PqzBiQd1GLAvxhvn76ZdqV8xRKU4SXmh54P/
sN3rL5xGzvJ93bi7QMTfa0gR5BjmyB4BHSl5VDCqMPRIquAeY+2BWZA=
X-Received: by 10.99.247.69 with SMTP id f5mr135507663pgk.81.1483631962866;
Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.99.247.69 with SMTP id f5mr135507583pgk.81.1483631962094;
Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zapata.dreamhost.com (zapata.dreamhost.com. [66.33.216.56])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n6si76290873pga.123.2017.01.05.07.59.21
for <***@udel.edu> (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 66.33.216.56 is neither permitted nor
denied by best guess record for domain of sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org)
client-ip=66.33.216.56;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 66.33.216.56 is neither permitted nor denied by best
guess record for domain of sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org)
smtp.mailfrom=sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org;
dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Received: from zapata.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by zapata.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BF18DB2E64;
Thu, 5 Jan 2017 07:59:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ***@lists.libsdl.org
Received: from icculus.org (icculus.org [74.81.175.20])
by zapata.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E677B984244
for <***@lists.libsdl.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 15:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 2846 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2016 23:50:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO libsdl.org) (***@192.241.223.99)
by icculus.org with ESMTPA; 3 Dec 2016 23:50:16 -0000
Received: by libsdl.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:50:15 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <***@forums.libsdl.org>
References: <***@forums.libsdl.org>
<***@forums.libsdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <***@forums.libsdl.org>
From: "EternalLands" <***@gmail.com>
X-Generated-By: M2F: www.mail2forum.com
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:50:15 +0000
To: ***@lists.libsdl.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:12 -0800
Subject: Re: [SDL] Wierd shifted colors and unsatisfactory GL_Context
X-BeenThere: ***@lists.libsdl.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ***@lists.libsdl.org
List-Id: SDL Development List <sdl-libsdl.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.libsdl.org/options.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org>,
<mailto:sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/>
List-Post: <mailto:***@lists.libsdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org>,
<mailto:sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8413020203679037438=="
Errors-To: sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org
Sender: "SDL" <sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org>
X-gae-vortex: 1
X-Gm-Spam: 0
X-Gm-Phishy: 0
X-Gm-Original-To: ***@udel.edu
How does your code look like? How about alpha? Did you try to change the stencil or depth to fewer
bits?
Even in a RGB444 mode, the colors shouldn't look like that. I mean, no red instead of green.
just received a bunch that were delayed.
An example is attached below... delayed over a month?!?!?
Ed Phillips <***@udel.edu> University of Delaware (302) 831-6082
Systems Programmer IV, Network and Systems Services
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Return-Path: <sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org>
X-Original-To: ***@udel.edu
Delivered-To: ***@udel.edu
Received: from mail-pf0-f200.google.com (mail-pf0-f200.google.com
[209.85.192.200])
by ed-dev.nss.udel.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC2C91001C9
for <***@udel.edu>; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:59:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-pf0-f200.google.com with SMTP id z128so69982995pfb.4
for <***@udel.edu>; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Gm-Message-State:
AIkVDXJtlV8bFKJYDUO1mMOG06S8bqNQE0D/8Dk9PqzBiQd1GLAvxhvn76ZdqV8xRKU4SXmh54P/
sN3rL5xGzvJ93bi7QMTfa0gR5BjmyB4BHSl5VDCqMPRIquAeY+2BWZA=
X-Received: by 10.99.247.69 with SMTP id f5mr135507663pgk.81.1483631962866;
Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.99.247.69 with SMTP id f5mr135507583pgk.81.1483631962094;
Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from zapata.dreamhost.com (zapata.dreamhost.com. [66.33.216.56])
by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n6si76290873pga.123.2017.01.05.07.59.21
for <***@udel.edu> (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:22 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 66.33.216.56 is neither permitted nor
denied by best guess record for domain of sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org)
client-ip=66.33.216.56;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 66.33.216.56 is neither permitted nor denied by best
guess record for domain of sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org)
smtp.mailfrom=sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org;
dmarc=fail (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com
Received: from zapata.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by zapata.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BF18DB2E64;
Thu, 5 Jan 2017 07:59:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: ***@lists.libsdl.org
Received: from icculus.org (icculus.org [74.81.175.20])
by zapata.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E677B984244
for <***@lists.libsdl.org>; Sat, 3 Dec 2016 15:50:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 2846 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2016 23:50:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO libsdl.org) (***@192.241.223.99)
by icculus.org with ESMTPA; 3 Dec 2016 23:50:16 -0000
Received: by libsdl.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:50:15 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <***@forums.libsdl.org>
References: <***@forums.libsdl.org>
<***@forums.libsdl.org>
In-Reply-To: <***@forums.libsdl.org>
From: "EternalLands" <***@gmail.com>
X-Generated-By: M2F: www.mail2forum.com
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2016 23:50:15 +0000
To: ***@lists.libsdl.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 07:59:12 -0800
Subject: Re: [SDL] Wierd shifted colors and unsatisfactory GL_Context
X-BeenThere: ***@lists.libsdl.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ***@lists.libsdl.org
List-Id: SDL Development List <sdl-libsdl.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.libsdl.org/options.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org>,
<mailto:sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.libsdl.org/pipermail/sdl-libsdl.org/>
List-Post: <mailto:***@lists.libsdl.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.libsdl.org/listinfo.cgi/sdl-libsdl.org>,
<mailto:sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8413020203679037438=="
Errors-To: sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org
Sender: "SDL" <sdl-***@lists.libsdl.org>
X-gae-vortex: 1
X-Gm-Spam: 0
X-Gm-Phishy: 0
X-Gm-Original-To: ***@udel.edu
How does your code look like? How about alpha? Did you try to change the stencil or depth to fewer
bits?
Even in a RGB444 mode, the colors shouldn't look like that. I mean, no red instead of green.